Evaluating and dismantling an intervention aimed at increasing White people s knowledge and understanding of racial justice issues Author Alissa Hochman, Karen Suyemoto Publication Year 2020 Type Journal Article Abstract In this study, we built upon prejudice reduction interventions research (primarily in social psychology) and ally development investigations (primarily in applied psychology). We aimed to develop an intervention to foster knowledge and attitude change identified in both areas as central to reducing prejudice and increasing intentions to promote racial justice. Specifically, we aimed to determine whether online imaginal and psychoeducational interventions could contribute to White people s needed understandings to engage in racial justice work. Additionally, if some interventions were successful, we aimed to determine which components were most effective. We used three intervention components, two of which were created for this study: imaginal contact with a person of color, learning and reflecting about racism and its impact on people of color, and increasing awareness of White privilege and positionality. We randomized participants to different combinations of the intervention components and control components to not only evaluate combined components but also dismantle the intervention, determining whether specific aspects of the intervention were more effective. Participants completed outcome measures about their attitudes and understandings prior to the intervention, immediately postintervention, and 3 weeks after completing the intervention. Findings demonstrated that the intervention and its components positively impacted outcomes of interest, with increasingly complicated learning requiring more comprehensive intervention to change. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2021 APA, all rights reserved) Keywords racism, privilege, social justice, White people, prejudice reduction, intervention, justice, prejudice, Racial Justice, learning, racial and ethnic groups, Treatment Outcomes Journal Am. J. Orthopsychiatry Volume 90 Pages 733–750 The following is an excerpt of the intervention methodology. For more information, please see the full text of the article on the publisher's website or through your institution's library. Method We recruited participants through the online platform Amazon Mechanical Turk (MTurk) Procedure we randomly assigned participants to one of six intervention conditions (see next section), with different combinations of control and experimental intervention components. After completing the intervention components in Part 1, participants completed outcome measures a second time. After the Part 1 survey, participants received a thank you message and $7 compensation for their participation, along with a reminder that they would be asked to complete a follow-up survey in 3 weeks. Three weeks later, we asked participants to complete Part 2, consisting of the outcome measures and open-ended questions inquiring about the experience and impact of the intervention. Intervention Components The independent variable consisted of assignment to one of six intervention conditions with varying sequences of three of the six experimental and control components. Experimental components included imaginal contact, racism understanding and empathy, and privilege and positionality. Imaginal contact The current study included a prompt that asked participants to imagine a positive interaction while sitting on a train next to a person of color. The control component prompted participants to imagine a positive, relaxing setting for 2 min Racism understanding and empathy The experimental component of racism understanding and empathy included a first-person narrative told from the perspective of a White person who had learned the complexity and negative impact of racism. The narrative included a comprehensive definition of racism and situated the impact of racism in the United States today within a historical context. Additionally, the narrator shared accounts from people of color about personal, emotionally evocative experiences of racism. Within the reading, the narrator shared their own process learning about racism, including misconceptions they had; difficult emotions learning about racism evoked, like guilt; and why it mattered to the narrator to continue learning. The racism empathy and understanding control component was a reading about soup that paralleled the length, structure, and types of information provided in the experimental component (e.g., factual, personal narrative, process of developing understanding and changing attitudes) and qualitative questions after the reading. White privilege and positionality The reading for the White privilege and positionality experimental component was told from the first-person perspective of a White person who had developed an awareness of their own White privilege and its impact on their life. The reading included an explanation of White privilege and concrete examples of how it manifests in one’s life, and it explicitly addressed issues of defensiveness through the narrator’s explicit discussion of working through their own negative reactions and the reasons understanding White privilege mattered to them. For the control component, participants completed a reading about ice cream that paralleled the length and structure of the White privilege and positionality experimental component Combining experimental and control components: The independent variable of intervention conditions The six intervention conditions included (a) all control components (control condition), (b) imaginal contact only (contact only condition), (c) racism understanding and empathy only (racism only condition), (d) racism understanding and empathy plus White privilege and positionality (racism and privilege condition), (e) imaginal contact plus racism understanding and empathy (contact and racism condition), and (f) all experimental components (full intervention condition). Measures Outcome measures Outcomes of interest for the current study included warmth towards people of color, color-blind racial ideology, ethnocultural empathy, and White privilege attitudes (i.e., White privilege awareness, White privilege remorse, and willingness to confront White privilege). Participants competed the following scales immediately prior to the intervention, immediately after intervention completion, and 3 weeks later at follow-up. Type of Prejudice/Bias Race/Ethnicity Country United States Method Online / Survey Setting Online Google ScholarBibTeX