In-Group Distinctiveness and Self-Affirmation as Dual Components of Prejudice Reduction Author Michael Zárate, Azenett Garza Publication Year 2002 Type Journal Article Abstract Hypotheses drawn from Tajfel and Turner's (1986) Social Identity Theory and a hypothesized “need for distinctiveness” predict that attention to how two groups differ, as opposed to how they are similar, should reduce prejudice. Previous research, however, indicates that a self-awareness manipulation is needed for prejudice reduction to occur (Zárate et al., 2000). It is possible, however, that the previous self-awareness manipulations acted as self-affirmation procedures, which may complicate any interpretations. Research by Fein and Spencer (1997) based on Self-Affirmation Theory show that self-affirmation procedures enhance self-concept, which acts to reduce expressed prejudice. The present studies test hypotheses concerning a need for distinctiveness and the role of the self in prejudice reduction. Participants were asked to focus on between-group similarities or between-group differences, after which participants performed a self-affirmation task (Experiment 1) or a negative self-awareness task (Experiment 2). Results demonstrate that attention to group differences, in conjunction with a self-awareness manipulation, reduces prejudice. The findings are discussed for the relevance to various theories of prejudice and for models of cultural pluralism. Keywords ingroup distinctiveness, self affirmation, prejudice, social identity, self awareness Journal Self & Identity Volume 1 Pages 235-249 Type of Article Journal Article DOI 10.1080/152988602760124865 Full text Participants One hundred and twenty undergraduate students [...]. Design The design was a 2 (Comparison Type: Similarity vs. Difference) x2 (Affirmation Type: Self vs. Other) factorial design. Dependent Measures The main dependent measure entailed a scale in which participants made “prejudicial’’ evaluations of one ethnic out-group. Participants responded to these items on a 7-point Likert-type scale [...]. Procedures All participants first rolled out a demographic information questionnaire [...]. [...] participants were asked to either make similarity or difference ratings between their ethnic in-group and an ethnic out-group. Instructions for these comparisons were as follows [Text A] The similarity and difference ratings were of 20 traits which were composed of 10 traits pretested to be stereotypic[...] and 10 traits [...] pretested to be non-stereotypic or neutral. For each of the traits, participants were to rate them on a 7-point Likert-type scale. After the ratings, participants were asked either to [Text B]. [...] all participants evaluated the ethnic out-group on a 16-item scale. Finally, all participants completed the 16-item Collective Self-Esteem scale (CSE) (Luhtanen & Crocker,1992) and Rosenberg’s (1965) 10-item Personal Self-Esteem scale (PSE). Type of Prejudice/Bias Other Country United States Method Lab Setting College/University Google ScholarDOIBibTeX