In-Group Distinctiveness and Self-Affirmation as Dual Components of Prejudice Reduction

Publication Year
2002

Type

Journal Article
Abstract

Hypotheses drawn from Tajfel and Turner's (1986) Social Identity Theory and a hypothesized “need for distinctiveness” predict that attention to how two groups differ, as opposed to how they are similar, should reduce prejudice. Previous research, however, indicates that a self-awareness manipulation is needed for prejudice reduction to occur (Zárate et al., 2000). It is possible, however, that the previous self-awareness manipulations acted as self-affirmation procedures, which may complicate any interpretations. Research by Fein and Spencer (1997) based on Self-Affirmation Theory show that self-affirmation procedures enhance self-concept, which acts to reduce expressed prejudice. The present studies test hypotheses concerning a need for distinctiveness and the role of the self in prejudice reduction. Participants were asked to focus on between-group similarities or between-group differences, after which participants performed a self-affirmation task (Experiment 1) or a negative self-awareness task (Experiment 2). Results demonstrate that attention to group differences, in conjunction with a self-awareness manipulation, reduces prejudice. The findings are discussed for the relevance to various theories of prejudice and for models of cultural pluralism.

Journal
Self & Identity
Volume
1
Pages
235-249
Type of Article
Journal Article
Full text

Participants 

One hundred and twenty undergraduate students [...].

Design 

The design was a 2 (Comparison Type: Similarity vs. Difference) x2 (Affirmation Type: Self vs. Other) factorial design.

 

Dependent Measures 

The main dependent measure entailed a scale in which participants made “prejudicial’’ evaluations of one ethnic out-group.

Participants responded to these items on a 7-point Likert-type scale [...].

 

Procedures 

All participants first rolled out a demographic information questionnaire [...].

[...] participants were asked to either make similarity or difference ratings between their ethnic in-group and an ethnic out-group.

Instructions for these comparisons were as follows [Text A]

The similarity and difference ratings were of 20 traits which were composed of 10 traits pretested to be stereotypic[...] and 10 traits [...] pretested to be non-stereotypic or neutral. For each of the traits, participants were to rate them on a 7-point Likert-type scale.

After the ratings, participants were asked either to [Text B].

[...] all participants evaluated the ethnic out-group on a 16-item scale. Finally, all participants completed the 16-item Collective Self-Esteem scale (CSE) (Luhtanen & Crocker,1992) and Rosenberg’s (1965) 10-item Personal Self-Esteem scale (PSE).

Type of Prejudice/Bias
Country
Method