Andrews, Nadia P., Kumar Yogeeswaran, Matt J. Walker, and Miles Hewstone. 2018. “Effect of Valenced Vicarious Online Contact on Out-Group Prejudice and Perceived Out-Group Variability: A Study of Online Poker”. Journal of Applied Social Psychology 48. Wiley: 571–581. doi:10.1111/jasp.12548. Reference Link
LaCosse, Jennifer. 2014. “Five Minutes of Fame: The Benefits of Imagined Contact With Famous Gay Men and Lesbians”. Florida State University. Referenced from diginole.lib.fsu.edu: Five minutes of fame: The benefits of imagined contact with famous gay men and lesbians. Reference Link
Lyons, Patricia A. 2012. “An Experimental Test Of Extended Contact Hypothesis: Its Boundary Conditions And Psychological Processes”. University of Texas Arlington. Referenced from rc.library.uta.edu: An Experimental Test Of Extended Contact Hypothesis: Its Boundary Conditions And Psychological Processes. Reference Link
Harrison, Patrick R. 2014. “Remember the Good Times: Does Savoring a Previous Intergroup Interaction Increase Whites Positive Intergroup Emotions and Willingness to Develop Future Intergroup Friendships?”. Loyola University Chicago. Referenced from ecommons.luc.edu: Remember the Good Times: Does Savoring a Previous Intergroup Interaction Increase Whites Positive Intergroup Emotions and Willingness to Develop Future Intergroup Friendships?. Reference Link
Latu, Ioana M. 2010. “Reducing Automatic Stereotype Activation: Mechanisms and Moderators of Situational Attribution Training”. Georgia State University. Referenced from scholarworks.gsu.edu: Reducing automatic stereotype activation: Mechanisms and moderators of situational attribution training. Reference Link
Koech, Jasmine Maria. 2016. “Contact and Explicit and Implicit Bias Towards Latinos As”. College of William and Mary. Referenced from scholarworks.wm.edu: Contact and Explicit and Implicit Bias Towards Latinos/as. Reference Link
Schuhl, Jennifer, Eric Lambert, and Armand Chatard. 2019. “Can Imagination Reduce Prejudice Over Time? A Preregistered Test of the Imagined Contact Hypothesis”. Basic and Applied Social Psychology 41. Informa UK Limited: 122–131. doi:10.1080/01973533.2019.1579719. Reference Link
Gu, Jun, Annika Mueller, Ingrid Nielsen, Jason Shachat, and Russell Smyth. 2019. “Improving Intergroup Relations through Actual and Imagined Contact: Field Experiments With Malawian Shopkeepers and Chinese Migrants”. Economic Development and Cultural Change 68. University of Chicago Press: 273–303. doi:10.1086/700569. Reference Link
Lim, Charmaine W.Q., Al K.C. Au, and Rhiannon N. Turner. 2020. “Imagined Contact and Mental Illness Stigma in an Asian Context: Bolstering the Effect and Examining the Impact of Factual Information”. Journal of Community & Applied Social Psychology 30. Wiley: 307–321. doi:10.1002/casp.2442. Reference Link
Bagci, Sabahat C, Ecem Piyale, Isik Bircek, and Efsane Ebcim. 2018. “Think Beyond Contact: Reformulating Imagined Intergroup Contact Theory by Adding Friendship Potential”. Group Processes & Intergroup Relations 21. SAGE Publications: 1034–1052. doi:10.1177/1368430217690237. Reference Link
Brauer, Markus, and Abdelatif Er-rafiy. 2011. “Increasing Perceived Variability Reduces Prejudice and Discrimination”. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology 47. Elsevier BV: 871–881. doi:10.1016/j.jesp.2011.03.003. Reference Link
Turner, Rhiannon N., Keon West, and Zara Christie. 2013. “Out-Group Trust, Intergroup Anxiety, and Out-Group Attitude As Mediators of the Effect of Imagined Intergroup Contact on Intergroup Behavioral Tendencies”. Journal of Applied Social Psychology 43. Wiley: E196–E205. doi:10.1111/jasp.12019. Reference Link
Welker, Keith M., Richard B. Slatcher, Lynzey Baker, and Arthur Aron. 2014. “Creating Positive Out-Group Attitudes through Intergroup Couple Friendships and Implications for Compassionate Love”. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships 31. SAGE Publications: 706–725. doi:10.1177/0265407514522369. Reference Link
Berthold, Anne, Carola Leicht, Nicole Methner, and Petra Gaum. 2013. “Seeing the World With the Eyes of the Outgroup — The Impact of Perspective Taking on the Prototypicality of the Ingroup Relative to the Outgroup”. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology 49. Elsevier BV: 1034–1041. doi:10.1016/j.jesp.2013.07.007. Reference Link
Turner, Rhiannon N., and Keon West. 2012. “Behavioural Consequences of Imagining Intergroup Contact With Stigmatized Outgroups”. Group Processes & Intergroup Relations 15. SAGE Publications: 193–202. doi:10.1177/1368430211418699. Reference Link
van Leeuwen, Esther, and Susanne Täuber. 2012. “Outgroup Helping As a Tool to Communicate Ingroup Warmth”. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin 38. SAGE Publications: 772–783. doi:10.1177/0146167211436253. Reference Link
Vezzali, Loris, Dora Capozza, Sofia Stathi, and Dino Giovannini. 2012. “Increasing Outgroup Trust, Reducing Infrahumanization, and Enhancing Future Contact Intentions via Imagined Intergroup Contact”. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology 48. Elsevier BV: 437–440. doi:10.1016/j.jesp.2011.09.008. Reference Link
Hall, Natalie R., Richard J. Crisp, and Mein-woei Suen. 2009. “Reducing Implicit Prejudice by Blurring Intergroup Boundaries”. Basic and Applied Social Psychology 31. Informa UK Limited: 244–254. doi:10.1080/01973530903058474. Reference Link
Hasson, Yossi, Noa Schori-Eyal, Daniel Landau, Béatrice S Hasler, Jonathan Levy, Doron Friedman, and Eran Halperin. 2019. “The enemy’s Gaze: Immersive Virtual Environments Enhance Peace Promoting Attitudes and Emotions in Violent Intergroup Conflicts”. Edited by Stefano Triberti. PLOS ONE 14. Public Library of Science (PLoS): 1-14. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0222342. Reference Link
Kossowska, Małgorzata, Piotr Dragon, and Marcin Bukowski. 2014. “When Need for Closure Leads to Positive Attitudes towards a Negatively Stereotyped Outgroup”. Motivation and Emotion 39. Springer Science and Business Media LLC: 88–98. doi:10.1007/s11031-014-9414-5. Reference Link
Pagotto, Lisa, Emilio Paolo Visintin, Giulia De Iorio, and Alberto Voci. 2012. “Imagined Intergroup Contact Promotes Cooperation through Outgroup Trust”. Group Processes & Intergroup Relations 16. SAGE Publications: 209–216. doi:10.1177/1368430212450057. Reference Link
Seger, Charles R., Eliot R. Smith, Elise James Percy, and Federica Invernizzi. 2014. “Reach Out and Reduce Prejudice: The Impact of Interpersonal Touch on Intergroup Liking”. Basic and Applied Social Psychology 36. Informa UK Limited: 51–58. doi:10.1080/01973533.2013.856786. Reference Link
Vorauer, Jacquie D., and Stacey J. Sasaki. 2010. “In Need of Liberation or Constraint? How Intergroup Attitudes Moderate the Behavioral Implications of Intergroup Ideologies”. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology 46. Elsevier BV: 133–138. doi:10.1016/j.jesp.2009.08.013. Reference Link
Urbiola, Ana, Guillermo B. Willis, Josefa Ruiz-Romero, and Miguel Moya. 2018. “Does a Multicultural Perspective Shape Unbiased Minds? The Moderating Role of Outgroup Threat”. Journal of Applied Social Psychology 48. Wiley: 608–617. doi:10.1111/jasp.12551. Reference Link
Simão, Claudia, and Markus Brauer. 2015. “Beliefs about Group Malleability and Out-Group Attitudes: The Mediating Role of Perceived Threat in Interactions With Out-Group Members”. European Journal of Social Psychology 45. Wiley: 10–15. doi:10.1002/ejsp.2085. Reference Link
Gill, Michael J., Michael R. Andreychik, and Phillip D. Getty. 2013. “More Than a Lack of Control: External Explanations Can Evoke Compassion for Outgroups by Increasing Perceptions of Suffering (Independent of Perceived Control)”. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin 39. SAGE Publications: 73–87. doi:10.1177/0146167212460281. Reference Link
Stiff, Chris, and Tom Bowen. 2016. “Two-Player Game: Playing Casual Video Games With Outgroup Members Reduces Levels of Prejudice Toward That Outgroup”. International Journal of Human –Computer Interaction 32. Informa UK Limited: 912–920. doi:10.1080/10447318.2016.1212484. Reference Link
Scacco, Alexandra, and Shana S. Warren. 2018. “Can Social Contact Reduce Prejudice and Discrimination? Evidence from a Field Experiment in Nigeria”. American Political Science Review 112. Cambridge University Press (CUP): 654–677. doi:10.1017/s0003055418000151. Reference Link